IMPLEMENTATION LEVEL

National

AFFECTED FLOW

Inflow

ANNOUNCED AS TEMPORARY

No

NON-TRADE-RELATED RATIONALE

No

ELIGIBLE FIRMS

all

JUMBO

No

TARIFF PEAK

No
← back to the state act
Inception date: 01 Nov 2010 | Removal date: open ended
Still in force

Bailout (capital injection or equity participation)

On 28 September 2010, the Italian authorities notified their intention to grant rescue aid to Tirrenia di Navigazione S.p.A. in amministrazione straordinaria.
 
Tirrenia is a company that provides passenger and freight maritime transport services. The company operates a series of cabotage routes connecting mainland Italy with Sicily, Sardinia and the Tremiti islands and an international link with Albania (Bari-Durazzo).
 
The company is currently facing severe difficulties which have led to the admission of Tirrenia into the collective insolvency procedure foreseen underItalian law for large companies, "ammministrazione straordinaria"4 on 5 August 2010, followed by its declaration of insolvency by the competent Court on 12 August 2010.
 
Italy intends to grant a State guarantee on credit lines provided by private banks to Tirrenia, for an amount of EUR 95 million.
 
The commission found that the measure constitutes State aid within the meaning of Article 107 (1) TFEU and gave the following assessment:
 
'Firstly, the measure at stake consists of a guarantee which is selective as it is deemed to favour Tirrenia and Siremar.
Secondly, the measure will be financed by the general budget of Italy, and thus undoubtedly by a Member State and through State resources.
Thirdly, the guarantee will provide the beneficiaries with access to credit lines that, given that the companies are currently subject to insolvency procedures, the beneficiaries would not have been able to obtain at comparable conditions. Under those circumstances, the guarantee confers an economic advantage to the beneficiaries, who are able to improve their overall financial situation.
Finally, when aid granted by a Member State strengthens the position of an undertaking compared to other undertakings competing in intra-Union trade, the latter must be regarded as affected by that aid. It is sufficient that the recipient of the aid competes with other undertakings on markets open to competition. In the present case, the beneficiaries operate in competition with other undertakings providing maritime transport services in the EU, in particular since the entry into force of the Council Regulation (EEC) No 4055/86 and Council Regulation (EEC) No 3577/92, liberalising the market of the international maritime transport and maritime cabotage respectively. Therefore, the measure under scrutiny is liable to affect EU trade and distort competition in the internal market.' (par. 36-39 of the letter from the EC to Italy - Brussels, 16.11.2010 C (2010) 8150)
 
The Commission has come to the conclusion that the aid is compatible with the internal market pursuant to Article 107(3)(c) TFEU and has accordingly decided not to raise objections to the notified measure.
 
A state measure in the GTA database is assessed solely in terms of the extent to which its implementation affects the extent of discrimination against foreign commercial interests. On this metric, the state aid proposed here is discriminatory.
 

 

AFFECTED COUNTRIES

MAP
TABLE
EXPORT

Please report this page in case you detect an inaccuracy in its content.