Russia: State aid plan for the "Russian Corporation of Nanotechnologies" for 2009-2015
Description
The Government, in pursuit of the previously announced Programme of Long-term Socio-economic Development of the Russian Federation, has announced a state aid plan for Russian Corporation of Nanotechnologies (RUSNANO) for 2009-2015. The plan contains the following investment projects.
in 2010 - 1 billion + 53 billion (state guaranties) = 1,2 billion Euro
in 2011 - 39 + 25 billion = 1,42 billion Euro
in 2012 - 40,4 billion + 28 billion = 1,52 billion Euro
in 2013 - 33 billion = 0,73 billion Euro
in 2014 - 18 billion rubles = 0,4 billion Euro
in 2015 - 11 billion rubles = 0,24 billion Euro
The Russian Corporation of Nanotechnologies (RUSNANO - http://www.rusnano.com) was established in 2007 by the Federal law № 139-FZ to enable Government policy in the field of Nanotechnology.
To accomplish this task, RUSNANO co-invests in nanotechnology industry projects that have high commercial potential or social benefit. Early-stage investment by RUSNANO lowers the risk of its investment partners from the private sector.
RUSNANO participates in building nanotechnology infrastructure, which includes the nanotechnology centers of excellence, business incubators and early stage investment funds. RUSNANO provides scientific and educational programs that are required for its investment projects to succeed, and also supports the popularization of nanoscience and nanotechnology. RUSNANO selects promising spheres for investment based on longer-term foresight created by the leading Russian and world experts.
To assist the Russian nanotechnology industry advance to the global market and strengthening of its international links RUSNANO develops partnerships with the leading nanotechnology centers in the world and organizes the annual Nanotechnology International Forum in Russia.
Any Evidence-Based Deliberation:
| Question | Result |
|---|---|
| Is there anything in the public record to suggest that evidence of the effectiveness of the proposed measure was considered during official deliberations? | |
| Is there any evidence that alternatives to the proposed measure were considered? | |
| Is there anything in the public record that suggests that empirical evidence informed the comparison across the alternatives available to government? | |
| Was such evidence identified? | |
| Is such evidence publicly available? | |
| Did the official decision-maker in question provide an explanation as to why a chosen measure was favoured over alternatives? | |
| Is there any evidence to suggest that potentially affected trading partners were consulted before the measures were taken? | |
| Is there any evidence that safeguards have been put in place to ensure that implementation of the initiative is transparent and non-discriminatory? | |
| Did the government state its intention to review the measure within one year of implementation? |
Date Discovered:
Implemented: Yes
Date of inception: 5 Oct 2009
Duration: 75 months
GTA Evaluation: Red
Source:
Government Decree # 1454-p 5 October 2009.
Government Response:
- 408 reads
