Indonesia: FDI in the mining sector

Measure #1718 | Published 25 Aug 2010 ▲

Description

Indonesia issued a regulation specifying the scope of the obligation of foreign investors to divest mining concessions. Two implementing regulations under Indonesian law No. 4 of 2009 (the "Mining Law") were issued on 1 February 2010: Government Regulation No. 23/2010 ("GR23") on Mining Business Activities and Government Regulation No. 22/2010 ("GR22") on Mining Areas. We are following these developments closely, and will provide updates focused on their effect on foreign investment activities as new implementing regulations are published — see our previous alert on the Domestic Market Obligation regulations.
 
Article 112 sets out the divestment obligations. This article generally requires foreign shareholders to divest a proportion of their ownership in Indonesian mining concessions to local parties within five years of commencement of production. GR23 clarifies that only 20% of the 'foreign capital' is required to be divested within this timeframe. The definition of 'foreign capital' in the regulation is weak, according to some analysts, as it does not employ a beneficial owner test and may suggest that an entity that is even minority local owned is exempted from the definition. 

Any Evidence-Based Deliberation:

Question Result
Is there anything in the public record to suggest that evidence of the effectiveness of the proposed measure was considered during official deliberations?
Is there any evidence that alternatives to the proposed measure were considered?
Is there anything in the public record that suggests that empirical evidence informed the comparison across the alternatives available to government?
Was such evidence identified?
Is such evidence publicly available?
Did the official decision-maker in question provide an explanation as to why a chosen measure was favoured over alternatives?
Is there any evidence to suggest that potentially affected trading partners were consulted before the measures were taken?
Is there any evidence that safeguards have been put in place to ensure that implementation of the initiative is transparent and non-discriminatory?
Did the government state its intention to review the measure within one year of implementation?

Implementing Jurisdiction:

Affected Trading Partners:

Measure type:

Affected Sectors:

Affected Tariff Lines:

(mouse over for more info)

Date Discovered:

Implemented: Yes

Date of inception: 1 Feb 2010

GTA Evaluation: Red

Government Response:

Glossary of trade terms