China: Antidumping investigation concerning imports of polyvinyl chloride

Measure #0797 | Published 16 Oct 2009 ▲

Description

 On September 28, 2009 Chinese Ministry of Commerce issued a notice stating that the antidumping duties on polyvinyl chloride originating from the United States, Korea, Japan, Russia and Taiwan will be maintained. The decision is a result of the sunset review. 

Any Evidence-Based Deliberation:

Question Result
Is there anything in the public record to suggest that evidence of the effectiveness of the proposed measure was considered during official deliberations?
Is there any evidence that alternatives to the proposed measure were considered?
Is there anything in the public record that suggests that empirical evidence informed the comparison across the alternatives available to government?
Was such evidence identified?
Is such evidence publicly available?
Did the official decision-maker in question provide an explanation as to why a chosen measure was favoured over alternatives?
Is there any evidence to suggest that potentially affected trading partners were consulted before the measures were taken?
Is there any evidence that safeguards have been put in place to ensure that implementation of the initiative is transparent and non-discriminatory?
Did the government state its intention to review the measure within one year of implementation?

Implementing Jurisdiction:

Affected Trading Partners:

Measure type:

Affected Sectors:

Affected Tariff Lines:

(mouse over for more info)

Date Discovered: 16/10/2009

Implemented: Yes

Date of inception: 28 Sep 2009

GTA Evaluation: Red

Source:

As reported by Antidumpingpublishing.com

Press release of the Chinese Ministry of Commerce (available only in Chinese)
http://gpj.mofcom.gov.cn/aarticle/c/200909/20090906538713.html

Government Response:

Glossary of trade terms